Polio Pulse

Polio Pulse provides social listening insights to support GPEI’s polio interventions on disinformation, crisis communication, and strategic communication. Data is monitored from polio-endemic and outbreak countries and geographies classified by GPEI, covering 12 major languages spoken in these regions. The platform is managed by the UNICEF Digital Community Engagement (DCE) team.

High Risk

Guinea‑Bissau Hep-B trial controversy spills over into polio mistrust

Geography
Guinea Bissau
United States
Nigeria
Pakistan
Italy
India
Thailand
Themes
Research and clinical trials

Analysis

In mid-January 2026, online discussions surged around a planned clinical trial of the hepatitis B birth-dose vaccine in Guinea-Bissau, following the public circulation of a leaked protocol and subsequent commentary by researchers, clinicians, and global health observers. The trial, which aimed to study the effects of adding a hepatitis B birth dose to the existing neonatal vaccine schedule in a low-resource setting, was rapidly framed online as evidence that even long-established vaccines are still “experimental.” 

The controversy intensified as critics argued that the study raised ethical concerns, particularly around informed consent and equipoise, and questioned whether it was appropriate to test a birth-dose intervention in a country with fragile health systems. As the debate escalated, several influential voices—some with a history of vaccine skepticism—began presenting the trial not as a research question about program optimization, but as proof that health authorities themselves are uncertain about vaccine safety and benefits. 

Crucially, this framing did not remain confined to hepatitis B. Posts and threads explicitly drew parallels with polio vaccination, citing past observational studies from Guinea-Bissau on OPV and DTP, and reviving long-standing claims that early-life vaccines increase all-cause mortality. In these narratives, the HepB trial was positioned as the latest example of “children in Africa being used as test subjects,” a colonial-era trope that resonated strongly in Nigeria, Pakistan, and parts of Europe and North America. As news spread that the trial would not proceed as initially planned, this was misrepresented online as a “quiet admission of harm,” reinforcing suspicion toward all birth-dose and early-life vaccines, including polio. 

The episode is being used to argue that vaccination schedules are unstable, ethically questionable, and driven by experimentation rather than evidence—undermining confidence in polio programs that rely on early, repeated contact with caregivers.

Recommendations

Clear separation between the halted trial and established vaccine safety is needed, with joint statements from MoH, Africa CDC, WHO, and UNICEF and transparent community engagement.